This post is my response to an article on a Medium blog entitled “I Have Read Prop F, and It is Worse Than You Think.” The author of the article, a blogger who goes by Emey, says he is a concerned citizen drawing attention to a local issue. He makes several points about the proposed legislation, each of which I address below. As I will point out in great detail, the author’s analysis is uninformed at best, but I believe it much more likely to be deliberately misleading. The author misrepresents the law in very specific ways. He goes to great trouble to detail parts of the law and imagine unreasonable, worst-case scenarios while skipping completely over the parts of the law that address his concerns – even when they’re right in the part he’s citing. It may sound reasonable to say, “I’m all for regulation, just not this one,” but these critiques always use that argument. As you will see below, Prop F is a well-written, reasonable regulation aimed at addressing a social problem.
So let’s get into it. First of all, there’s nothing unusual, sloppy, or “draconian” about Prop F. Most importantly, every single restriction in here – other than registration and reporting – is completely invalid so long as the residential unit is rented for only 75 days or less during the year. Continue reading I Have Read Prop F, and It Is a Perfectly Normal and Reasonable Piece of Legislation